I am a director: it is what I studied in school and what I identify as professionally . I taught directing for many years and I take the responsibilities of the director very seriously. So, I do not answer this question lightly. The director needs to get back in their own lane. It is not the job of the director to decide what sort of tech is used anymore than it is the job of the lighting designer to dictate an actor's objective. I am all for collaboration and everyone should be able to contribute thoughts, but these decisions should be the realm of the designer.
Of course, all absolutes have caveats: if you spent five years lobbying for moving lights, you probably should use them (so don't do
Diary of Anne Frank). If you aren't working with a designer but someone is helping you out, they may prefer more specific ideas. And every director/designer relationship is unique.
------------------------------
William Addis
Chair of Visual and Performing Arts
Westtown School
West Chester PA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-12-2018 18:16
From: Crit Fisher
Subject: We got it. We gotta use it!
Good evening colleagues,
Thought I'd post something humorous to the group and see what fun stories we have. For my designer friends in the audience, how many time have you been coerced to put something in the design of the show, just because the theatre you work at has it?
So I worked with a director who insisted on me incorporating moving lighting in every show because we had it. Don't get me wrong, they have their place, but trying to incorporate movers in "The Mousetrap" and "Diary of Anne Frank" is a stretch.
Interested in your experiences.
------------------------------
Crit Fisher
Lighting/Sound Designer
New Albany High School
------------------------------