We had the same issue with script requirements for The Play That Goes Wrong. We are casting the minimum amount of actors, 8, and yet we had to purchase 14 scripts. Plus two director scripts and two stage manager scripts. We only have one director and one stage manager. I called to inquire if we could only order the minimum we needed. Received a big fat no and was told because it is listed as flexible casting we are required to purchase the maximum scripts "in case we decide to add additional actors later or for the tech crew" and the additional director and stage manager scripts "are to be used for the techies if we don't have other adults". We also had to purchase an additional production package and didn't have the option to just pay the regular royalties without all the extra stuff. When I pushed back he said he was happy to help me find other show options that don't require all this additional stuff. Really that's their solution? I'm just as frustrated as you are.
I am all for paying the authors what they are entitled, that is the proper and right thing to do, but they need to allow us to buy only what we need and don't demand that we purchase additional materials we don't need and can't afford. This new policy that is starting to run through the publishing houses is asinine. I've seen this argument on a number of message boards. The publishing houses are stating it's the authors that are implementing this new policy and yet I've seen a number of authors chime in to these discussions having no clue that this is happening or didn't know it was happening to this extent. Some authors have stated that they make most of their money off the royalties and not the scripts so don't really care about the script sales and instead it is the publishing houses that make more money off the scripts then they do royalties. Who really knows for sure where this is steaming from, but ultimately, and unfortunately, this seems to be the new direction the theatre industry is going.
I think we have a few options. Being up front with your admin about the rising costs and their new requirements. Hopefully if you have a supportive admin they are willing to send a little more money your way. Fundraising and being up front with the community about the rising costs as well. At least for us, we have found the families and community very supportive and willing to give because they want to continue to see good theatre and give our students a great theatre experience. We have a one act showcase night dedicated to donors and potential donors. We do a minimal "wine & dine" with desserts and showcase some of our best talent. At intermission we have a plea for donations or opportunities for business to purchase ad space in our programs and are up front as to why this plea is necessary. This funding helps to cover some of the financial gaps. And there are still a number of shows out there that don't have those requirements (at least not yet) but I believe they tend to be the less popular plays. Ultimately it depends on the publishing house and the individual play as to what we must purchase. Generally, I have found the more popular the play the more purchasing requirements there seems to be on them.
------------------------------
Jillian Lietzau
Lutheran High School
CO
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-26-2023 09:33
From: Ernesto Rosas
Subject: Licensing fees
Hello friends. I saw a few conversations about this last year, but didn't have to deal with it back then. I'm currently looking into getting a license for Almost, Maine and have the smallest amount of actors needed for the play. Why am I needing to purchase 18 scripts, plus music rights and a nonprofessional fee for my high school production? We are a financially challenged district and community in Tennessee, and level 1 school. These fees take up a little more than half of our entire budget. Is this the only way to put on plays, now?
------------------------------
Ernesto Rosas - SAG-AFTRA
Theatre Arts Teacher
East Hickman High School
Lyles, TN
------------------------------