First a few comments about the sell off of the 600MHZ band that has affected us all. This was first announced almost 5 years ago, and then when it happened they gave us a couple of years notice of the auction date and then there was a grace period which ends between now and Jan 2020 depending on geographical locations. It wasn't last minute.
You are right in that the wireless mic community was not given very much consideration because we were pitted against the masses (including ourselves) who want our cell phones to act as always connected super fast computers. When 500 million cell phones need to be wirelessly connected at broadband speeds they need more bandwidth than was available, and the needs of the many way out rank the needs of the few.
Secondly ...wireless gear or most electronics for that matter, has a reliable life expectancy of 7 to 10 years, so whenever you add wireless gear there needs to be a plan in place to replace the equipment in that period - if you can stretch it a few years take that as a plus, but don't expect flawless performance out of it. Sound, video and lighting equipment is not like a house that lasts forever with just basic maintenance, it is more like a TV set or computer that has a finite working life and then needs upgrading.
All the major wireless manufacturers have been offering generous rebate schemes for months now for anyone upgrading into new systems. Sennheiser and Audio-Technica are running theirs until March 31st 2019 while Shure's official end is on October 31st this year.
I appreciate that it is a burden for most schools, especially if the early notifications somehow skipped your attention (though there have mean items in this forum for almost years now), and you are not alone. Folks on the business end are also affected. I have well over 100 channels in rental that will become totally illegal come Jan 2020, and which cannot already be used in NYC, LA and a couple of other major cities due to T-Mobiles "testing".
My cost to replace these will run somewhere between $120,000 and $200,000 which like you is cash I don't have laying around. So like all of us I have to find ways to make it work - some will be replaced straight away taking advantage of the rebates to lessen the burden, others will be replaced over time at full price, and any shortfall I need to meet rentals will be done through sub-rentals until we catch up to demand. It is just a fact of business - we have to move with the vagaries of the market. Nothing stays the same. I knew this was coming, and made sure anything new I added over the last few years was not going to be negatively impacted.
Will the government sell of more bandwidth to the Telecoms? ... probably. Will that be a problem? YES! Can I or the industry do anything to stop it? No, at best, like this round, just get time to minimize the downside. Likely band we will lose next is 554-608MHz or if we are lucky just 580MHz to 608MHz. So My advice is buy 470 to 554 MHz systems. I also recommend going digital over UHF (not 2.4GHz nor most 900MHz systems) as you can get way more channels in a much smaller band (like 40-50 channels pr 24MHz vs 10-16 with analog)
PLEASE DO NOT MAKE OUR KIDS ACCESSORIES TO A CRIME:I am particularly concerned by the thought that it is acceptable to just keep using the illegal channels in the hope of not getting caught. What a great example to set to our children! I know our political process is breaking down to the - "
it's not a crime unless you get caught" philosophy, but once that hits our schools society is indeed doomed. I sincerely hope that this was more an expression of frustration than an actually an intent to condone and encourage the breaking of the law, and the co-opting/encouraging children to be part of that. Under the law the person using the transmitter is the person who is in breach of the FCC regulation forbidding the use of an unlicensed transmitter on the 608-698MHz band. Please be careful. If you have a dozen transmitters on a show that could be 12 breaches per performance times the maximum fine which I understand is $100,000 - does you school board want to be liable for that. Do you local tax payers want to be on the hook for that - sounds like an excellent way to kill of the theatre program for generations to come.
If I can help any of you that have problems with existing systems please feel free to call me 908-899-1277
------------------------------
Rod Reilly
Owner, Bodymics
908-899-1277
Somerset NJ
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-01-2018 08:55
From: Valerie Farschman
Subject: Microphone Frequencies in Schools
We are a public school in Ohio and we have no money to completely replace the sound/microphone system. I guess we will deal with interference and hope that we are not fined. Whoever changed this did not consider the impact on schools and churches, nor cared.
------------------------------
Valerie Farschman, Drama Director
MLS Theatre Company, Troupe 1422
Marion L Steele High School
Amherst, Ohio
Original Message:
Sent: 09-28-2018 17:24
From: Julie Musbach
Subject: Microphone Frequencies in Schools
Hi everyone,
I'm a journalist with BroadwayWorld.com and we recently came across a story concerning wireless microphone frequencies. A frequency was auctioned off to big business, and now schools and amateur companies around the country are forced to purchase new equipment or face interference or hefty fines. (See this article for more information.)
Are you facing this problem or do you know a school or company who is? We're assembling an article for our readers and would love to help everyone get the word out especially about any fundraisers for new equipment.
Thanks!
Julie
------------------------------
Julie Musbach
BroadwayWorld
------------------------------