Our program has both co and extra-curricular productions. We have two production classes, first semester we focus on a children's theatre production that we use as outreach to our elementary schools in our district. With this production there are no out of class rehearsals. In the spring we always have a large scale musical which has in class and after school rehearsals. it is a large commitment for the students.
In addition we have a fall show which is entirely extra-curricular and four times throughout the year student directed one-acts. We do between 25 and 35 one-acts a year. Then my advanced classes perform for invited audience for their final projects.
We find the blend a very workable way of accommodating all of the students. AND they still want to do more.
------------------------------
Stewart Hawk
Garfield High School, Seattle WA
Original Message:
Sent: 09-27-2015 16:12
From: Raymond Palasz
Subject: Co-curricular vs. Extra-curricular
Jim,
I think there is a distinct value in having a co-curricular theatre course. There was a year I taught our acting courses for my colleague while she was on maternity leave. I incorporated the NIES as a unit of study in auditioning (something that isn't usually done in the course). Most of the students in the advanced class, the course I put this into, attend State, and I require anyone who is not a first-time attendee to State to participate in some way, IEs being one of them. I had tremendous work being done that ended up doing well at State. All of the other years, we haven't done as well because I am doing coaching after school around contest play, fall play, and musical rehearsals. I give the students credit, though, because they do go into it with energy and excitement despite the busy schedule.
Additionally, doing things like IEs in class, then taking it to State to me is the same as band/choir/orchestra going to ISSMA. It's taking standards based activities and getting that external feedback that our music colleagues get.
Now our advanced acting classes do a rotation of improv and scripted shows that are open to the public. However, students are permitted to take the class for three years, and that's all they do. So I would love to see some curricula from others on how to take the co-curricular notion and expand it past improv and basic scripted shows.
In talking with my administration, however, they do not like co-curricular courses because then they can't drug test the kids, and there have been a couple of incidents where students have gotten in trouble with substance issues. I don't know that drug testing students would have prevented this from happening. Rather, a policy of consequences for what happens if it occurs would be optimal.
This is a great thread, Jim! Thanks for starting this and I hope we hear from others! Can't wait to see you at Regionals too!
------------------------------
Raymond Palasz
Schererville IN
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-26-2015 16:09
From: Jim Peterson
Subject: Co-curricular vs. Extra-curricular
I'm curious if anyone would like to weigh in on a debate between offering theatre productions as a co-curricular activity or as extra-curricular productions. Most theatre programs that I'm aware of offer theatre strictly as extra-curricular productions. Students volunteer by auditioning for the production, rehearsals are held after school and there is no connection to a theatre class.
Are there any programs out there that offer theatre strictly as a co-curricular activity where productions are mounted as an extension of a theatre class? Rehearsals are done mostly in class with performances open to the community. This model seems to work well for the other performing arts: choir, band and orchestra. I was curious to see if anyone follows that sort of model and if so, how it works.
What are the advantages that one model holds over the other? Thanks!
------------------------------
Jim Peterson
Indianapolis IN
------------------------------