I agree with Jerry that it would be useful for vocational students, those who will be going into the entertainment industry, to know about the equipment that they will encounter out there if they are going to be board ops. I've worked with students who have had to start at the bottom after graduation in order to learn new boards. But also, designers should know how to communicate with their board ops, so it helps to know how their equipment works too and what the capabilities are.
Also a good point about whether a vocational student is going to go into 'events' (concerts and the such) or 'production' (live theatre). The equipment is typically different, as are the design techniques.
Which begs the question, is lighting art or technology? Or a bit of both?
Is it the teacher's goal to train students how to program electronic equipment or is it the teacher's goal to train students about what light 'does' – or both? I had a student once who learned how to run the Element at our high school, and then went on to a college where she designed lights for a show and had to run them herself using a two-scene preset board. When I went to see her show, she commented to me that now she finally understood what she was doing with the light because she was physically manipulating it, rather than just pushing a bunch of buttons that she'd been told to push. Yes, she'd be trained in design, by moi, but that visceral control of the light finally helped her really understand what the light 'does'.
Which is why I, with a designer's bias, am an – controversial I know – advocate for more hands-on boards, such as the Express, at the high school level. If a student learns how to design and what light 'does', then they can learn the technology of any other board. (The same case goes for analog versus digital sound boards – but what do I know about those, I'm just a lighting geek). Of course, with LEDs coming onto the market more and more, everything is becoming more and more about the programming.
So, regardless of which side of the fence you sit on, when choosing a light board, it's important to first know what you want to teach the students; design or programming or some combination. And then, which board will help you best accomplish that. Or maybe more to the point, what do your students want to learn. Do you have designers or do you have 'tech-geek' programmers? I've seen students who are natural designers learn the technology (the best board ops I've had in high schools are the ones who have a design sense and can second guess my commands before I'm half finished with my sentences), but I rarely see 'tech-geeks' learn a design sense, or even want to. Just give them something to program - they just want to get their hands on that light board (these kids though, are your best trouble shooters!).
Of course, in the educational setting I believe you should teach design techniques alongside programming skills, regardless of the inclination of the students, because in the real world it works best when the board ops know what the designers are conceptualizing and the designers know what the board ops are doing.
Again: Designing Backwards. It's important to be aware of what your end objectives are (design/art, programming/technology, or a bit of both?, and also: concert lighting art and programming or production lighting art and programming) before you pick the board that will best help you achieve your educational objectives.
------------------------------
Beth Rand, EBMS
Educational Lighting Designer
School Theatre Operations Coach
www.PRESETT.org- HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE OPERATIONS ONLINE COURSE (http://www.presett.org/tmt.html)
- NEW! INDEPENDENT STUDY for those who don't have time to join a cohort!
- ION, ELEMENT, EXPRESS & COLOR THEORY - ONLINE MINI COURSES
(http://www.presett.org/litt.html)
-HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE OPERATIONS and LIGHTING BASICS BOOKS (http://www.presett.org/helpful-books.html)
- THE ECLECTECH SHOPPE (http://www.presett.org/eclectech.html)
beth@PRESETT.orgWestminster, CO
------------------------------